Package: initscripts Version: 2.88dsf-13.13 Followup-For: Bug #601757
Not everyone seems to be of the opinion that a single cgroup mount point is the right thing to do. https://github.com/poelzi/ulatencyd/issues/26#issuecomment-3030891 Quoting the author of Ulatency: ulatency can be adjusted to a single mountpoint, but as said many times, it will suck and make it harder und more complicated to use. CPU subsystem is totally broken when Realtime Cgroups is enabled and you need constant fixing on that, making it harder with unified mountpoints. You can not even create more then one level of in blkio cgroup which will make the cpu configuration useless. Single mount point of all cgroup subsystems IS A BAD IDEA. You can configure it to do so, but it will not help you. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages initscripts depends on: ii coreutils 8.13-3 ii debianutils 4.0.4 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii lsb-base 3.2-28 ii mount 2.19.1-5 ii sysv-rc 2.88dsf-13.13 ii sysvinit-utils 2.88dsf-13.13 Versions of packages initscripts recommends: ii e2fsprogs 1.42~WIP-2011-10-16-1 ii psmisc 22.14-1 initscripts suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/default/bootlogd changed: BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=Yes -- no debconf information _______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
