El 8 de gener de 2012 16:47, Roger Leigh <[email protected]> ha escrit: > No, 2) is replacing with a symlink, while 6) is removing the > now unneeded symlink. I noticed that if you mv /dev/initctl > /dev/initctl.old, init (I presume) immediately recreates > /dev/initctl. > > The following sequence appears to work: > > # New control channel > mkfifo /run/initctl > # Symlink to new channel > ln -s /run/initctl /dev/initctl.new > # Replace existing channel with symlink > mv /dev/initctl.new /dev/initctl > # Reopen control channel (now /run/initctl) > kill -SIGUSR1 1 > # Replace init with new version using new paths > init u > # Delete old path > [rm /run/initctl] > > If /dev/initctl is not open or is invalid, "init u" exits with > an error, so we can loop on this in the postinst to wait until > it's reopened. It's pretty quick though, so perhaps loop a > fixed number of times and then continue with a warning if not > possible, especially since it's not fatal?
Sounds good. Btw, please remember not to hardcode /dev/initctl since the old path is kernel-specific. -- Robert Millan _______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
