Hi Craig, On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:13:58PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > Hello sysvutils maintainers, > I am the Debian procps developer as well as one of the upstream > developers for procps. We have been discussing some things with the > sysvutils maintainers and as a result pidof will shortly be moving > across to procps.
> This email is just an early heads-up we're working on it and to make > sure that we work together so it the change happens smoothly. I suspect > a replaces line in control should do it nicely. Please inform debian-devel of this change as well so the impact can be discussed more widely. I know that I for one have chroots where sysvinit-utils is installed as a transitively essential package, and procps is not. I don't know if pidof is actually going to be a problem for anyone in this regard, but I don't know that it *won't* be - so we should get some more eyeballs on this change. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
