Hi, On 06/11/14 at 09:17 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Thank you for looking at this issue again. :) > > [Lucas Nussbaum] > > There are two relevant lintian checks: > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/init.d-script-missing-lsb-section.html > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/init.d-script-depends-on-all-virtual-facility.html > > This last lintian check have a strange description: > > > The given init script declares a dependency on the virtual facility "$all". > > > > This virtual facility is reserved for local scripts. > > > > Moreover, using $all in more than one init.d script is totally broken. > > The $all virtual facility is not reserved for local scripts (who came > up with that idea? It is not from me, who introduced $all to Debian). > And $all is only broken with systemd, as it will ignore the setting. > With sysvinit/startpar/insserv, the value causes scripts to be placed > first/last in the boot/shutdown sequence. The implementation is > slightly confusing, but it is not totally broken. > > The test is good, but as I believe we need a way to scripts to get > started last during boot and first during shutdown, I believe the > proper fix is for systemd to be fixed to implement support for $all > instead of pretending that the feature is useless and reserved for > local scripts.
Bastien added it in http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=f8a60da5ba1f30b5d7d96fd846a3f2cb9d6dcd32 Ccing him. Lucas _______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
