On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 15:17 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Ben Hutchings] > > > This file name seem a bit misleading, as I would read it to mean > > > initramfs ask for fsck on the root, not initramfs already did fsck on > > > the root. What about /run/initramfs/skip-fsck-root or something like > > > that instead? > > > > initramfs-tools already creates that file. > > Aha. What it is used for? Who are using the file today?
systemd looks for it:
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-fsck-root.service:ConditionPathExists=!/run/initramfs/fsck-root
> I suspect
> that fact that the code to create it already is in initramfs-tools does
> not affect the amount of confusion its name will cause. Do you agree
> with my observation about the name being a bit misleading, or do you
> find it to be a good and non-confusing name? Should it be renamed or
> kept the way it is?
I don't agree with you. Its meaning is documented in the initramfs-
tools manual page.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice.
- John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
