Thanks for your swift action!
Sorry, I forgot about nsf :(
No problem. :)
I wondered: Do you also have a course of actions in mind re the
following two issues:
Being on it, I noticed that the CI tests fail for the current version
(2.2.0-1) on unstable:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/nsf/
This is because the unstable CI test runner obtains Tcl 8.7a1, rather
than 8.6.9. Why is this the case? 8.7 is in experimental, not unstable?
I see that CI test uses experimental for some reason. I don't know why, I'll
investigate this.
Let me know whether and, if, how I can help.
Background: NSF is runtime-dependent on the major Tcl version. I have
the strong feeling that I should be more careful about the dependencies
then.
If NSF requires the Tcl version to match one with which it was built,
then it should not depend on tcl or libtcl, but on tcl8.6 or libtcl8.6
specifically.
Yeah, the dependency should be narrowed. But I wondered how one would
target 8.7 then on experimental, if at all. Package for experimental,
and there built against 8.7, I guess.
Thanks, Stefan
_______________________________________________
Pkg-tcltk-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-tcltk-devel
