Upon review, it's clear that 'itcl3' is not a library name (the library is named libitcl3.4), and that there are no reverse-depends of this package in the archive using the library. Therefore I propose to not change the itcl3 package name for this transition, and leave the package as-is. Closing this bug.
-- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-tcltk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-tcltk-devel
