On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Michael Gilbert wrote: > * Fix typo in the previous changelog entry (closes: #807026).
Hello. I see now what you changed here: make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' error: wine's arch:all packages do not build on 64-bit architectures This is certainly better than nothing, but still leaves the issue unfixed. As a result, this package would FTBFS on amd64 in the usual way, i.e. without even having to use "dpkg-buildpackage -A". You say that this may not be built on amd64, but if I look at the contents of the different _all.deb packages, I see text files in /usr/share/doc, shell script wrappers in /usr/lib/wine, manpages, etc. But no ELF binaries, no libraries, etc. So I should ask: Which one of those files is so special that they may not be built on amd64, and why not? I also keep a successful build log for version 1.6.2-22. Why this was not an issue in wine_1.6.2-22? Thanks. _______________________________________________ pkg-wine-party mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party
