On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Jens Reyer wrote: > Speaking of the tools: > > Do we give up on 32-/64bit co-installability of the tools permanently? I > saw nobody complaining, neither after their dependencies made them > not-coinstallable, nor since they officially conflict now.
My opinion is yes. > If yes, I propose to provide symlinks in path for all the tools now in > /usr/lib/wineVERSION/ (wmc, wrc, winedump, winebuild and winemaker). 5 > additional links in /usr/bin seem fair to me for an optional package > that needs to be installed on purpose. That seems fine. > We may also merge the wine[32|64]VERSION-tools. No, we should leave it possible for the user to choose which bitness they want. On your 1.8 updates, keeping wine and wine-development totally in sync I think isn't totally desired. My intent is for things to bake in wine-development, and then get synced back up at stable release time. The way things are going now, we end up dealing with bug fixes twice. Best wishes, Mike _______________________________________________ pkg-wine-party mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party
