On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jens Reyer wrote: > Hi, > > I'd propose the following changes for the stretch branch (cherrypicked > from master, their commit messages are the indented lines). I'll commit > them if I hear no objection. > > > Fix for #816014 (/usr/bin/wine hides errors by default) and #816017 > (/usr/bin/wineserver: unnecessary noise on stderr). Or do we want to > test this more? IMO it's a fine compromise: > Re-enable err output (Source: release 1.9.4-2) > Drop version output (Source: release 1.9.5-1) > > Fix current wine in the archive: > Break older wine32|64 without reverse version requirement. > > Fix for current git; > Install winegcc script again to specify WINEBUILD. > > Feature: Provide more programs/tools in /usr/bin and ship their manpages.[1] > Add winepath symlink and manpage in wine. > Fix wmc and wrc symlinks. > Add winecpp and wineg++ symlinks in -tools. > Add symlinks in /usr/bin for installed tools. > Add patch to fix macro not defined errors from man. > Install all manpages for all installed executables. > Drop wine32 manpage.
All seem fine. > [1]: I really want to have the Debian alternatives system for wine and > wine-development in stretch. Although not a strict requirement for this, > I suggest to bring/keep the *relevant* packaging in sync (as done with > these proposed commits), make another wine (stable) release, wait a few > weeks and then roll out the Debian alternatives system (sometime between > April and June, giving us more than 6 months for testing). Waiting for > Wine 2.0 (which will probably make it in stretch given the recent change > of the freeze date) would be too late for bigger changes. Also ok. Best wishes, Mike _______________________________________________ pkg-wine-party mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party
