Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:35:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#495707: Bug#495707: segfaults when
moving up directories too fast
has caused the Debian Bug report #495707,
regarding segfaults when moving up directories too fast
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
495707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495707
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: thunar
Version: 0.9.0-10
Severity: normal
If one goes into a fairly deep directory tree and wants to get back a
known number of directories up, one can quickly click that many times on
the "go up a directory" button. However, if you press this at any
moderate speed, thunar segfaults.
This is easily reproducible by entering a deep directory structure and
clicking "up", "back" or "forward" relatively fast.
I installed thunar-dbg and ran it in gdb to give me a backtrace.
Hopefully it will be of some use:
#0 0xb787ebda in IA__g_object_ref (_object=0x8b107589) at
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.16.5/gobject/gobject.c:1718
#1 0x08090ed2 in thunar_standard_view_get_visible_range
(view=0x8258070, start_file=0xbfa90338, end_file=0x0) at
thunar-standard-view.c:1399
#2 0x0809d916 in thunar_window_set_current_directory (window=0x8107050,
current_directory=0x80c29a8) at thunar-window.c:2330
#3 0x0809edfd in thunar_window_action_go_up (action=0x80db1a0,
window=0x8107050) at thunar-window.c:1746
#4 0xb788a084 in IA__g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (closure=0x8197018,
return_value=0x0, n_param_values=1, param_values=0xbfa905c8,
invocation_hint=0xbfa904fc,
marshal_data=0x809edc0) at
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.16.5/gobject/gmarshal.c:77
#5 0xb787c923 in IA__g_closure_invoke (closure=0x8197018,
return_value=0x0, n_param_values=1, param_values=0xbfa905c8,
invocation_hint=0xbfa904fc)
at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.16.5/gobject/gclosure.c:490
#6 0xb788fead in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x8120bd8, detail=0,
instance=0x80db1a0, emission_return=0x0,
instance_and_params=0xbfa905c8)
at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.16.5/gobject/gsignal.c:2440
#7 0xb78913f4 in IA__g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x80db1a0,
signal_id=112, detail=0,
var_args=0xbfa907dc
"��\r\b��\r\b\b\b���\025����\r\b0�\"\b(\b��\200�\212�\200�\212�
\025��(\b��\204�\210���\r\b(") at
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.16.5/gobject/gsignal.c:2199
#8 0xb7891856 in IA__g_signal_emit (instance=0x80db1a0, signal_id=112,
detail=0) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.16.5/gobject/gsignal.c:2243
--
Jonny Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:25:44AM +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 01:23:20 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Mhmh ok, I really can't reproduce. Does it still happen? Do you use
> > Bookmarks or tree view?
>
> So, I cannot reproduce this on another computer either. What a shame..
>
> Feel free to close this bug.
Ok, thanks. Closing
--
Yves-Alexis
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
