On mer., 2010-10-06 at 20:27 +0200, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote: > > Based on how many bugs this release fixes compared to the previous > > one, I'd be tempted to say that you should take it anyway, > > especially for debian, since it doesn't have stable releases all > > that often. But I can understand if you need to adhere to a process. > > > > Does it make any difference if I add that I am willing to provide > > long term support (crashes and security issues) for 1.0.0, but not > > really for 0.4.0? > > > > - Florian > > > > For Debian, I'd say there are too many changes (even after filtering > autofoo files) to include it in squeeze at this time, and the release > team won't accept: > > 54 files changed, 6682 insertions(+), 2738 deletions(-) > > I can't speak for everyone though, so maybe another team member thinks > it would be ok?
Yup, agreed. There was another release update by RT member recently, and they reminded that we were in deep freeze and that they would only accept unblock requests for RC bug fix. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
