On jeu., 2013-05-16 at 09:22 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> I've not reassigned it, but honestly don't understand what you mean or
> where the rudeness is. Would be less rude if he had opened a new bug instead?
>   Isn't clear from the bug messages what the problem is? 

What is rude is what I get in my mailbox:

> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
> To: José Luis González <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#708002: sylpheed: ignores 
> gtk-can-change-accels = 1
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:48:10 +0000
> 
> Processing commands for [email protected]:
> 
> > reopen 708002
> Bug #708002 {Done: Ricardo Mones <[email protected]>} [sylpheed] sylpheed: 
> ignores gtk-can-change-accels = 1
> Bug reopened
> Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #708002 to the same values 
> previously set
> > reassign 708002 xfce4
> Bug #708002 [sylpheed] sylpheed: ignores gtk-can-change-accels = 1
> Bug reassigned from package 'sylpheed' to 'xfce4'.
> No longer marked as found in versions sylpheed/3.2.0-1.
> Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #708002 to the same values 
> previously set
> > retitle 708002 XFCE makes gtkrc-2.0 be ignored
> Bug #708002 [xfce4] sylpheed: ignores gtk-can-change-accels = 1
> Changed Bug title to 'XFCE makes gtkrc-2.0 be ignored' from 'sylpheed: 
> ignores gtk-can-change-accels = 1'
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
> 
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
> -- 
> 708002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708002
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact [email protected] with problems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
> 
This is an automated mail from the BTS in response to the reassign. No
word at all from the original maintainer or the reporter in order to
explain the new maintainer what is the problem and why it is reassigned.
I need to do the job myself to go through the BTS and read the whole
thread in order to understand why it has been reassigned, what the
problem is etc.

That is rude and it's considered really better to forward bugs with a
real mail to the new maintainer explaining what happens and making a bug
summary.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel

Reply via email to