On dim., 2014-08-10 at 01:36 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:38:55AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Hello again! > > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:29:18AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > > Control: retitle -1 Please support suspend/hibernate on non-systemd > > > systems > > > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > [...] > > > > As a followup on my previous mail, I'm going to add my suggested > > solution to the above request -- install/recommend systemd-shim. > > The systemd-shim package provides a logind D-Bus API implementation > > usable on non-systemd systems. Problem solved. > > The solution already seems to be implemented. > > $ apt-cache show xfce4-power-manager | grep shim > Recommends: libpam-systemd, systemd-shim | systemd-sysv > > Why was this bug report reopened? Why was it even filed in the first place? > The solution seems to have been there all the time. > Maybe systemd-shim being broken for a while confused you, but that should > be (and was) reported against systemd-shim. >
To be honest, the whole situation is pretty confused, especially since there are two entangled transitions: - the ConsoleKit -> libpam-systemd one (solved by systemd-shim for a while, then broken during the 204 -> 208 upgrade, then solved again) - the upower-0.99 upgrade, which is not completely fixed right now. This one should only affect xfce4-power-manager, but it still confuses people So right now I'm somehow letting the situation settle down a bit, and will try to revisit the bugs and close them accordingly. The ideal situation would be to support both init=systemd and init=sysvrc (with systemd-shim) for Xfce people, and it seems it's something we could achieve with Xfce 4.12, but I'm unsure it'll be released on time. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
