On jeu., 2015-03-12 at 15:15 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> So, I've had a look at the lightdm 1.12.2-1 source package, and
> indeed, at least these parts of patches/02_fix-apparmor-profile.patch
> can now be dropped:
>
> - #include <abstractions/dbus-accessibility>
>
> [...]
>
> - signal peer=@{profile_name},
> - ptrace peer=@{profile_name},
> - # needed when logging out of the guest session
> - signal (receive) peer=unconfined,
> + # this doesn't work with the current Debian apparmor
> + #signal peer=@{profile_name},
> + #ptrace peer=@{profile_name},
> + ## needed when logging out of the guest session
> + #signal (receive) peer=unconfined,Ok, done, will be part of the next upload to experimental. > > > I run lightdm and use apparmor and can test the profile shipped > upstream > > when i get home. > > If you're running sid, then you would be the ideal candidate to ensure > any future lightdm breakage caused by its AppArmor profile turns on > red lights in a timely manner, even if Yves-Alexis doesn't test the > packages he uploads with AppArmor enabled :) I did a quick try on sid (so with lightdm 1.10) but it seems that only the guest profile is actually confined, and I'm not using it, so it's hard to tell anyway :) In any case (and wrt. your mail on d-d-a), I'll try to install AppArmor and see what happens, although on a desktop box it seems that really not much is actually confined. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
