"David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the future, can we sync incompatible changes between planner > and muse with releases of both? In particular am using them > both and while I encourage them to be developped separately, I > think that due to their level of integration, changing a > central feature of muse such as this particular bug, would > necessitate a minor-update release of planner to accompany. > > Putting out the development snapshot solves it for now but with > tla, darcs, or any of the modern RCSs, we can easily apply that > fix necessary the stable version.
I try, but sometimes it just does not work out. In this case, a release of Planner should be out sometime in the near future, so I relied on that. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM. See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.
pgpqOoQsYpIuL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
