>>>>> "John" == John Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I wonder, would be appropriate to phase out planner?
>>
John> No, not in my opinion. If there are specific problems,
John> hopefully they
John> can be put in our tracker. We are getting closer to a release;
John> I've closed a good chunk of the bugs I had marked for that in
John> the last couple weeks. I use org-mode sometimes too and am
John> learning some things from it, but I still feel that Planner is
John> more my style and intend to keep it going, and I think there
John> are a lot of users who either feel the same way or are just
John> happy with what they have and would rather not switch to a new
John> system. I'd like to continue supporting them.
Like MWolson demonstrate, Planner have nothing to envy to org, and many
people use it, so why some people talk about stopping it ? If they
prefer org, they use org and let people that prefer planner use planner
So keep maintening planner, you do a great job.
--
A + Thierry
pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu/
_______________________________________________
Planner-el-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
