Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (sorry for this very scattered email, I'm commenting relevant lines of > the modified table.) > >> Corrected and expanded version: >> >> | export formats | See muse | HTML LaTeX > > IMO a full list of supported formats for planner would be useful > here. I plan to publish this table in HTML/LaTeX at some > point. Actually, the export options for planner/muse are so useful > that you should add them!
It's not always clear which export formats are meaningful in both a Planner and Muse context, which is why I didn't provide a list. See the Muse homepage for such a list. >> | RSS support | RSS 1.0, 2.0 | in development > > What kind of development are you refering to? I'd be very interested > in knowing this, since I've written blorg, which have support for RSS. I was referring to blorg (or whatever it was that dto now uses). I got the impression that it wasn't distributed with Org (in Emacs trunk) yet, hence "in development". >> | add-ons | more than org | TOC blorg registry > > Again, could you make a (even short) list of add-ons, possibly with a > short description? I don't have the time. Just look at the names of the Planner source files as a start. >> | mailers support | same as org | gnus vm wl mh rmail >> | link types | >> than org | http file bbdb w3 w3m info > > Which links are supported in planner that are not natively supported in > planner? BTW Org has the capacity to let people define new link types. See muse-protocol.el for a full list. Muse also has the ability to let people define new link types. ISTR that Planner defines some additional ones. An M-x grep-find "planner-add-protocol" through the Planner source will tell you what they are. >> | GTD implementation | has been done | yes > > Link? Specific example: http://genehack.org/2004/09/21 More examples: http://swik.net/planner.el+gtd >> | infile time manipulation | what is that? | yes > > Timestamps? I'm not convinced that this is a useful feature. Surely there's a minor mode for simple insertion of timestamps. >> | update same task, >1 pg. | yes | no > > Can you explain this a bit further? Using task IDs, Planner can update changes made to a task on one page to instances of the same task on different pages. It's really nifty, and it is one of the things that really makes Planner work well. >> | load individ. feature | yes | no > > What do you mean? I cannot think of a set of features that an average > Org user would not like to load. I'm a fan of the modular approach: only load what you really need. It avoids confusion by people who are just starting to use a project. Org tends to put most of its functionality into org.el rather than splitting it out. Unless you consider *all* of org.el to be "core functionality". >> | eval elisp during display | yes | no > > Same for xtla/pcvs, it's more like a link functionality than a real > add-on. And Org supports this: > > http://orgmode.org/org.html#External-links That's not the same thing. The Elisp in those Org links don't get evaluated at display time -- they get evaluated when you click on them. What Planner does puts it in a whole other league: you get to evaluate Lisp when the page itself is displayed. Example: generate a report and put it in a particular section. Example 2: include the contents of your Diary file with a fancy display in the Diary section of the current page. >> | escape specials @ publish | yes | no > > Can you explain this a bit more? I don't think Org bothers to escape characters that are special to LaTeX in its published documents (though ICBW -- it's been a while since I looked at it). It took a *lot* of work to get that right for Muse, since there are so many contexts where one must escape differently, such as links vs. normal document text vs. filenames of images. Additionally, Planner can do inline LaTeX: just (require 'muse-latex2png) and use the <latex> or <math> tags. It's much better than using "$" and "$$", in my opinion, since it's then more clear to non-LaTeX people exactly what kind of content you are publishing. I imagine that people would probably trip over the Org syntax if they were writing a lot of monetary amounts ("$100, $200", etc.), but I could be wrong. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 | http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | | Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgpCcMfiQB0Ny.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
