Markus Hoenicka <[email protected]> was heard to say:
> This function is almost two orders of magnitudes slower than on
> FreeBSD, but this doesn't explain the huge difference of the overall
> processing time. I'll continue profiling to find the culprit.
>
And now for something really interesting. I've used Cygwin's Emacs
this time. I've shunned this app so far due to some oddities, but it's
probably time to move on. Again, only the top 25 are shown here:
muse-project-publish-default 1 13.543
13.543
muse-project-publish 1 13.543
13.543
muse-project-publish-file 979
12.747999999 0.0130214504
muse-project-publish-file-default 979
12.124000000 0.0123840653
muse-publish-file 979
11.808000000 0.0120612870
muse-publish-markup 16 11.284
0.70525
muse-publish-markup-region 4
11.225999999 2.8064999999
muse-publish-markup-buffer 3 5.817
1.939
muse-publish-markup-tag 141 5.654
0.0400992907
muse-publish-mark-up-tag 1 5.487
5.487
muse-write-file 3 4.711
1.5703333333
muse-publish-markup-link 999
4.5740000000 0.0045785785
muse-publish-insert-url 999
4.3810000000 0.0043853853
muse-publish-url 999
4.3140000000 0.0043183183
muse-publish-classify-url 999
3.1959999999 0.0031991991
muse-project-link-page 999
3.0549999999 0.0030580580
muse-style-element 105046
2.1749999999 2.070...e-05
muse-project-page-file 1005
1.5009999999 0.0014935323
muse-project-file-alist 1009
1.4019999999 0.0013894945
muse-find-markup-element 13917
1.3379999999 9.614...e-05
muse-project-applicable-styles 1978
1.0109999999 0.0005111223
muse-project-determine-last-mod 1010
0.9740000000 0.0009643564
muse-project-resolve-link 999
0.9500000000 0.0009509509
muse-publish-escape-specials-in-string 4995
0.6490000000 0.0001299299
file-newer-than-file-p 978
0.5850000000 0.0005981595
As you can see, GNU Emacs is even faster on Cygwin than on my FreeBSD
box, the older hardware notwithstanding. I conclude that my speed
problems are neither planner's nor muse's fault, but are caused by
speed issues of the native Windows port of GNU Emacs.
Thanks again for getting me on the right track in the first place.
regards,
Markus
--
Markus Hoenicka
http://www.mhoenicka.de
AQ score 38
_______________________________________________
Planner-el-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss