On Tuesday 16 December 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday 16 December 2008, Marco Martin wrote: > > did set up a really precary twinview, and i can quite reproduce a problem > > like that, the problem seems when you try to select the same activity in > > two views, a thing that can likely break :p > > the only way i can imagine that happening is with a multi-input (not multi- > touch!) system with one plasma thread per input queue. iow, doubtful. > > what is supposed to happen is this (S for screen, C for containment, V for > view): > > * V1 is on S1, V2 is on S2 > * S1 is paired with C1, S2 is paired with C2 > * user selects C2 on S1 > * C2 takes S1 from C1, C1 temporarily get assigned no screen > * C2 then gives it's old screen, S2, to C1 > * we end up with S1 paired with C2 and S2 paired with C1 > * screenOwnerChanged signals should be emitted at every step along the way, > causing the V1 and V2 views to follow along with what's happening. > * V1 is now viewing C2, V2 is now viewing C1 > > the question is where along this path does it break down. it seems that at the end of operations the sistuation is the following: c2 is correctly on s1 c1 on s2 v1 is tied to s2, but v2 doesn't have containment, so the position of the view is quite random
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel