aspotashev added a comment.
I don't like this change because it introduces a Plasma-specific formula and makes the user guess how to match "degradation: 21%" against let's say "capacity: 85%" s/he saw when using a different OS or desktop environment. For example: 1. User looks at battery status in Plasma 5.16 and remembers battery capacity is 85%, 2. User updates to Plasma 5.17 and now there is "degradation 21%". How does one know if battery health improved or worsened over time and if the change was substantial? REPOSITORY R102 KInfoCenter BRANCH capacity-to-degradation (branched from master) REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D23270 To: ngraham, meven, broulik, #vdg, #plasma, filipf Cc: aspotashev, filipf, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
