ndavis added a comment.
In D25543#568160 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D25543#568160>, @hpereiradacosta wrote: > Also (and somewhat independently from this patch): with Qt6/KF6 being around the corner, I somewhat wonder about the utility of rewritting and hacking breeze at that time. Would this make sense to actually leave breeze (which is a rather well-working theme, with very little bug reports) unchanged, and start working anew on a new widget style targeting KF6 ? Would that not be more exciting, bring more people in, trigger new ideas, give more freedom ? And be a more ambitious task all in all ? > One could of course start from breeze, and apply all the new ideas about how the code should be organized, how highlight should look, and checkboxes, without disturbance for something which has lived largely unchanged (and with not so many complains) for all the kf5 lifetime ... > > My two cents. That's a fair point. I have thought a little bit about trying to start my own widget style and it would be easier to patch it a piece at a time instead of trying to do it all at once to prevent inconsistency between releases. REPOSITORY R31 Breeze REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D25543 To: ndavis, #plasma, #breeze Cc: hpereiradacosta, ngraham, IlyaBizyaev, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
