Appart from the wrongly choosen icon (which looks like a refresh button), i really can't see any problem with that feature. Don't let us go the gnome way and delete every feature that not at least 100% of the people use.
Am Dienstag 07 September 2010, um 14.27:43 schrieb Diego Moya: > On 7 September 2010 13:13, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > > Most Picture Frame users have several such applets on their desktop and > > rotate > > them to get a visually improved desktop. The Picture Frame applet is > > probably > > the strongest use case in rotating widgets. > > I don't imagine using it without the rotation. > > There are people reporting that this feature creates clutter and confusion, > for little proven benefit. If the Picture Frame does take advantage of this > feature, then keep it to this applet and remove it from the rest. > > Better yet, create a dedicated interface (a special containment, or a mode > to show it only when changing Preferences) to configure it when it's > needed, and get rid of it when it's not. > > In addition to manual direct configuration, this could also allow for some > automated effects (for example create a random rotation for all pictures, > or auto-rotate widgets to match acceleration sensors) that many people > would benefit from without spending much time tweaking their desktop. > > > When did we state we would give up on some options? > > > > I think he refers to people like Aaron saying that KDE 4 would avoid > > micro-management preferences that choose between two equally problematic > interfaces, trying to stick to one good design that works from the > beginning. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
