On Saturday 25 September 2010, Giulio Camuffo wrote: > In data sabato 25 settembre 2010 21:16:23, Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto: > > i think that's because you are confusing formFactor for "it means it's a > > panel" or "it means it's a desktop". it doesn't. formFactor refers to how > > things are arranged, regardless of where the containment is in the host > > application shell. > > From the apidox: > > Planar > The applet lives in a plane and has two degrees of freedom to grow. > Optimize for desktop, laptop or tablet usage: a high resolution screen 1-3 > feet distant from the viewer. > > Horizontal > The applet is constrained vertically, but can expand horizontally. > > You see, an applet in a FlowGroup is constrained vertically, so the > Horizontal form factor would be right, but an applet outside it has two > degrees of freedom, so the Planar form factor would be right in that case. > > And, on the other hand, i don't see how a new form factor would solve this > issue, as you suggested in your other message. How can a form factor > specify an applet it is constrained and it isn't constrained at the same > time?
seems to behave like 2 completely different containments in one, it could require something like a Continment::formFactor(Applet*) Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel