On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 16:21, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Dario Freddi wrote: >> On Monday 13 December 2010 20:57:20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > On Monday, December 13, 2010, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> > > > Btw: you all should probably figure out what you want your repository >> > > > names to be, if not you'll get names like "kdebase-workspace". >> > > >> > > Following a short discussion on IRC I propose to use the name "Plasma" >> > > for kdebase-workspace. >> > >> > i'm not 100% sure (but not 100% unsure, either) about that for a few >> >> > reasons: >> Me as well, why not calling it simply "workspace"? It's simple, direct, and >> imho somehow reflects the marketing scheme we're trying to follow lately. > > +1, workspace and runtime, without kde- plasma- whatever-
Dunno if dropping 'kde' makes sense. Dropping the 'base' makes sense, since its mostly a historical artifact. But workspace is KDE's workspace under past and present marketing schemes, so it makes sense. Plasma-workspace might be ok as well, even with Aaron's point. Just "workspace" seems way too generic. Remember this is the name the tarball would get, probably the name (new) distros would give the package as well... Ian _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
