On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, > the proposal is good, it should be a bit more elaborate tough. > the "qmlfy" term was used just for fun, however the official proposal > should > have a bit more serious name, like "QML port of workspace and addons > plasmoids" > > My primary target is the default plasmoids, and after that if there is time, I'll go ahead with the addons. So I have not mentioned those in the proposal. I hope that's fine. > please also state that you will work together whoever will write the plasma > qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that, could end up > be > necessary you to work also on them...) > > If qtcomponents gsoc doesn't get in (and mine does), I'll not be able to port as many plasmoids as planned. Is that considered ok? Regards, Viranch
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
