I understand and I agree with you. So I leave this work to someone more skilled by me. I'm still a newbie kde programmer. I'll close the review request.
Cheers 2011/12/28 Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org>: > On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 20:00:12 Simone Gaiarin wrote: >> Summarizing: >> 1)No redundant configuration interface should be added. >> 2)Only cycle through active activity is fine, but the dbus interface > > I still don't like this behaviour, as, even with a tooltip, it's still kind of > hidden. A more explicit behaviour would be nicer. > >> should provide a method to get the list of active activity to simplify >> the work, or it will be necessary to make a dbus call for every >> activity to check if it is active. But what is the sense of active or >> unactive activity? >> 3)The tooltip popup of the widget now says: "Click to show the >> activity manager". We can add a description like: "Scroll to switch >> activity." >> With this two changes who do not use activities can't do any mista >> since the widget does not do anything even if he scroll over it. >> Instead the activity aware user can know how the widget work from the >> tooltip. >> 4)Later, as a final improvement an osd with the activity name can be added. > > This is really what should be done, maybe like a kwin VD switching effect? > >> What do you think? > > I'm not a great fan of pushing in the wheel-switches-activity, this should be > improved in the correct way right away. We're so far away from feature freeze > (4.9) that we don't really need a quick thing in. > > Cheers, > -- > sebas > > http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel