On Friday 09 March 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote: > The resulting workflow if we take into account all of that is: > > - Keep the 6 month release period > - Keep the current schedule (soft freeze, hard freeze...) > - Move to a review based workflow before hard freeze (we need gerrit). > - Once we are on hard freeze, open merge for everyone so we can > continue fixing things easily.
that's sounds good. to me the ideal(tm) would be to not have much open/frozen master periods but rather have a master that is always in a releasable state, so a bit more destructured, but that seems even harder and this seems a good first step for it -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel