On Monday 09 July 2012, Mark wrote: > Hi folks, > > I really have to stress this out. It annoys me to even see it since it > seems so obvious (to me). > When you port some GUI part of KDE from C++ to QML i would expect the > porter to keep: > - feature parity > - visual parity > - functional parity > > So, i just installed KDE 4.9 RC 1 with high hopes of QML in some > places thus i happily started testing that. That's when i got some > "WTF" "No, you got to be joking!" moments.
may be better? yes. however this is not the right attitude at all to tackle it, it's not helping anyone. > The first thing i tested out was the shutdown dialog which is in QML > now. While it may have feature parity, it certainly lacks visual > parity and probably some functional parity as well. The first thing i > noticed was missing drop down shadows in corners. I leave the rest up > to the bug reports i made for it: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303216 just reproduces the old behavior > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303215 weird drivers issue, not really reproducible > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303214 fixed > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303213 old problem in the theme, not a regression, fixed now. > > Lets make KDE 4.9 rock solid! > indeed -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel