On Wednesday 03 October 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 03 October 2012 13:20:43 Marco Martin wrote: > > it's probably just a couple of places where is used and wasn't really > > documented yet (more on documentation issue later) so change would be > > fairly pailess > > > > opinions? ideas? > > the krunnermodel has been part of a release, right? Given that we should > not break the API, so I would suggest to go ahead with what you suggested, > but in addition keep the old import around. That way maybe existing 3rd > party users don't get broken.
yeah, it got into 4.9 :/ anyways is easy to use the same code and still have the old import (with a big comment in the code about removing it for plasma2) that thing also won't be mentioned in the documentation anywhere, while mentioned only the one in core Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
