On Saturday 12 January 2013 17:36:01 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Saturday, January 12, 2013 16:00:10 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > As already pointed out, this should be a set of people not a single one. > > a bus number greater than 1 is important, but i also think the realities of > doing this job limits the number of people who can, will and even should be > doing it.
I think we're talking on parallel lines here. I was referring *only* to the number of people who should test and fix master right away (or poke the list if they don't manage to fix by themselves). Which is... > > [*] Historical note no one will probably care about > > actually, i care :) i rather suspected this was the case, given the number > of developers i've heard this same kind of story from. the reason for > moving to packages varies, but fewer KDE devs run master than probably ever > before. it seems a recent phenomenon, just as with you. > > i'm personally very excited that more people will be running master again. > and i hope with an integration branch, that will extend even further. ... what I was describing here. More people running master and reporting findings. I'll sound like an old grump but it's one thing we did better in the past. I think we should actively try to restore that custom. Regards. PS: My apologies as I apparently have been unclear in that thread, the week has been rather exhausting for me. I should probably stay away from emails. :-) -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
