On Tuesday 29 January 2013 09:03:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 28 January 2013 18:54:12 Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Marco Martin wrote: > > > Most important, what is the less messy git way to do it? > > > > As we discussed on IRC, it may be better to split plasma out into its own > > repo now already, like we did with nepomuk.
I agree. > OTOH, there's also reasons to not split too early. It depended on quite some > stuff in other modules last I checked (could have changed), moving it to > another repo that early means less eyeballs and build problems likely > caught later. We have the all-seeing build.kde.org now for this :-) -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel