On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Martin Gräßlin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 13 February 2013 13:50:08 Mark wrote: >> That's the intention and that hasn't changed. Apparently most of you >> seem to disagree here. Apparently i'm the only one that dislikes >> having an empty space shown by default.. > to complement what Aurelien just wrote: you need to step aside from your own > use case to properly discuss it. It makes you blind to see that there are many > ways to get to what you need. So far you only focus on what you proposed to > change. > > I looked to the problem not from your perspective but from the global view. > Why is the pager implemented that way? Is that a valid use case? Is the use > case correctly implemented or are there better ways to implement the use case? > This lead for me to: let's remove the pager in the default setup.
I know and i did that :) The current pager is perfect if you have one monitor or perhaps even two since you can make a quite safe assumption that both monitors are on thus having a pager with one VD makes no sense. So yes, i took that step back and fully agree with how it's currently implemented based on that step. However, modern day desktops can have more displays attached then 1 or 2 and those displays don't have to be monitors. That's something to also consider and i'm doing exactly that. I think the current pager lacks that consideration. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
