2013/5/27 Kai Uwe Broulik <k...@privat.broulik.de> > I could add it to the expandable battery details but it will show the > overall remaining time for all batteries in contrast to the other > properties which are directly related to the battery they emerge from. > Actually I don't care. I don't have a strong opinion on whether to show it > or not. > > Would that be an acceptable compromise for all? >
I don't really like the compromise as it makes the estimation even worse (even if for most cases you only have 1 battery). I can have a look at the code over the next days and see if I can provide a patch. P.S.: Thanks for your work, the new plasmoid looks great > > Dario Freddi <drf54...@gmail.com> schrieb: > > > 2013/5/24 <k...@privat.broulik.de> > >> What's missing: >> - Remaining time. There is no "global" category anymore and since we >> discourage and removed the option for displaying remaining time, I didn't >> see the need to implement it in solod so we can show it in eg. the battery >> advanced properties >> >> > I promised to never talk about this again, but I have to break in: as > co-maintainer of the battery plasmoid I won't accept this change at all. I > am not going to argue about usefulness, defaults and truthfulness of the > value as too much has been said already. I will just say that many > distributions and users are relying on this hidden feature, and we cannot > remove it ESPECIALLY when we won't be providing updates to 4.x anymore. > > Such a choice has only one possible outcome: distributions and users > patching the plasmoid for restoring the functionality, hidden or not, > resulting in harder bug triaging and higher chances for breakage. > > Again, the argument is not technical but completely focused on what some > users and distributions apparently want, and the obvious consequences of > the change. > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
