El Dimarts, 14 de gener de 2014, a les 20:18:17, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > Hey, > > Until now, we've been using "Plasma 2" as a working title for the next > version of Plasma. We never formalized this, and the last discussion we had > about this died out without producing a clear result. We've gone over these > points during the sprint, and discussed some details about it. > > Some things that came up that we think are important for a new name: > > - We don't want it to be too technical, it should be engaging to "normal > people" > - Version numbers seem confusing an not very expressive, these should rather > be a technical detail (for example to group bugzilla entries) > - We want something that can be related to its release date > - We don't want to see it tied to a single class of devices > > We came up with the following scheme, which we'd like to propose: > > * The upcoming release of the KDE Plasma Workspaces is called Plasma > * The version number used is Month (as name) + year > * Each release gets a codename based on a marine animal (*1), in > alphabetical order, one for each feature release > * The exact name should be decided by the promo team (we have domain experts > that can give input, *ahum*) > * "workspaces" should hardly be used at all, it's a technical term and > doesn't bear all that much meaning for users > > So, some examples how that's used: > > * "Please file a bug against Plasma June/2014"
I do like it, but how does this work with bugfix vs feature releases? I.e. as a user may want to see if the new release i'm going to install is a bugfix release (i.e. i'm going from 4.12.0 to 4.12.1) or if it is a new feature release (i.e. i'm going from 4.12.0 to 4.13.0). Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
