On Saturday, February 01, 2014 19:33:31 Michael Jansen wrote: > > > > And as already discussed using the date of the final release in > > > > pre-releases is dangerous. > > > > > > Whatever you guys decide to use. It would be nice if it would be > > > compatible to > > > > > > http://semver.org/ > > > > > > This is the only attempt to standardize versions i know of. And > > > remember. I said NICE. > > > > I'm not sure whether that applies to us as we don't provide API (all API > > we > > provide is in frameworks (or should be in frameworks) and thus is properly > > versioned as 5.x.y). Also I expect that we will continue to version our > > .so > > in the frameworks way. > > They talk about semantic a lot there too. And i think it would be nice if > all of kde somehow uses version numbers one can understand without further > reading. > > The worst thing that can happen is if two kde version numbers use different > semantic meanings.
The KDE frameworks follow this scheme, anyway. For the workspace bits, I think the same scheme makes sense, and would be in line with how we've been doing it. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
