On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:33:05 Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> wrote:
> > Please add any notable bugs in Plasma 5.2 here
> > 
> >  https://community.kde.org/Plasma/5.2_Errata
> > 
> > Please check over the 5.1 errata page to see if any should be copied over
> > 
> >  https://community.kde.org/Plasma/5.1_Errata
> > 
> > Jonathan
> 
> Hi,
> I don't really understand the Performance explanation over there.
> If there's a case we don't perform properly (for example: Nvidia x954
> with mesa 17.14) then we name it, but saying [1] and [2] is far too
> vague and sounds like a cheeky "I told you so in the errata page
> move".
> 
> My proposal: if we know when it doesn't work, we list it or put up
> with it. If it's a problem and it's not listed, people can still
> report it and maybe even help.

I'm for removing that block completely. It's copied from previous releases and 
I don't think it applies any more. With Plasma 5.2 and Qt 5.4 we reached that 
point where "future releases brought us significant performance improvements".

Cheers
Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to