Hi all, I find phabricator quite interesting. It is easy to use, the only big issue I have with it is the insane naming of the tools.
(I guess Eike can weigh in more than this, I'm at a conference now, so need to be quick with my mail processing :) ) Cheerio, Ivan On 8 July 2015 at 15:48, Marco Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > writing about this now since it's nearing Akademy, it may be a good time and > place to discuss. > > last year at akademy we tried to put plasma-framework on gerrit, in order to > have a more formal, always review first policy in plasma-framework. > i think was partly a success, I see moresmall changes going on review all > around, still not perfect, but good! :) > > what was less of a success? Gerrit itself! > What happened is that we have slowly got back to review board for plasma- > framework as well, there never was a formal decision but just happened, gerrit > UI is just too bad, even the core team struggles with it, and is an absolute > put off for newcomers. > > Now, it probably makes sense to abandon gerrit once and for all, but I'm still > not happy with reviewboard, I would still love an all in one tool for reviews, > tasks etc. > Some projects are trying out phabricator (looking at kactivities) how do they > find it? > can it go more large scale? (more a sysadmin question) If it doesn't have big > obvious problems I would like to try it on plasma-framework at least. To > eventually have plasma-workspace et al too, but not yet (at least I would > never want gerrit on those projects..) > > -- > Marco Martin > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel -- Cheerio, Ivan -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
