On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Marco Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > writing about this now since it's nearing Akademy, it may be a good time > and > place to discuss. > > last year at akademy we tried to put plasma-framework on gerrit, in order > to > have a more formal, always review first policy in plasma-framework. > i think was partly a success, I see moresmall changes going on review all > around, still not perfect, but good! :) > > what was less of a success? Gerrit itself! > What happened is that we have slowly got back to review board for plasma- > framework as well, there never was a formal decision but just happened, > gerrit > UI is just too bad, even the core team struggles with it, and is an > absolute > put off for newcomers. > Fwiw, speaking as someone with one-two patches to p-f in month(s), I went to review board simply because I always forgot there's gerrit. Furthermore, my patches to p-f were usually parts needed for other patches in plasma-workspace/-desktop which went to review board, so that plus the fact that I post 99% of patches to review board made it kinda natural process to post to review board rather than gerrit, wasn't exactly a conscious decision (for any reason, be it UI or...) on my side. Cheers -- Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
