> On Nov. 30, 2015, 10:34 a.m., Tobias Berner wrote:
> > I think FreeBSD 10 introduced a similar interface in r277322
> > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=277322
> > Though it is explicitely stated to not be a "security feature".
> > 
> > According to the man page of progctl 
> > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=procctl&apropos=0&sektion=2&manpath=FreeBSD+10.2-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html
> > this would be PROC_TRACE_CTL with data PROC_TRACE_CTL_DISABLE.
> > 
> > 
> > I will have to ask someone more familiar with that.
> 
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>     > how do I get kwin to output the debug output for the framebuffer 
> backend, with qcdebug lines,
>     
>     Given the notes on it, that seems fine. It's not my intention to protect 
> against kernel or root.

>From a non-Linux perspective, it would be good if there was a CMake check for 
>`prctl()` and `PR_SET_DUMPABLE/PROC_TRACE_CTL` with a big warning in case none 
>was found. The oldest supported FreeBSD release (9.x) will be supported until 
>the end of 2016 and it does not have this functionality, and neither do 
>{Net,DragonFly,Open}BSD, so adding the calls without additional checks will 
>just create additional problems for those packaging kscreenlocker for those 
>platforms, and I doubt they will be able to add a replacement for this without 
>help from their kernel (and existing releases would still be broken).


- Raphael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126203/#review88939
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 30, 2015, 10:01 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126203/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 30, 2015, 10:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma and Tobias Berner.
> 
> 
> Repository: kscreenlocker
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Setting the PR_SET_DUMPABLE flag to 0 for the security relevant
> command kcheckpass and kscreenlocker_greet. If one wants to gdb into
> the running command it will result in:
> 
> ptrace: Operation not permitted.
> 
> For kscreenlocker_greet ptrace is permitted in testing mode.
> 
> As root it's still possible to attach to the process.
> 
> ---
> 
> @Tobias: I assume this is a strong linux-ism. Is there a FreeBSD compareable 
> functionality?
> 
> I'm considering to push this explicitly without an ifdef. It's a new security 
> feature and I want to make non-Linux systems aware of the fact that it adds a 
> new feature and that a replacement should be added.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   greeter/main.cpp e4e679e7ef40b319665428281fdba5f4e0b4eb25 
>   kcheckpass/kcheckpass.c fd2d2215bf2199f159a121bb0ce08e7b2b254aaa 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126203/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tried to gdb into the processes: failed
> Tried to gdb into kscreenlocker_greet --testing: succeeded
> Tried to gdb into kscreenlocker_greet as root: succeeded
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Gräßlin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to