bdhruve added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1672#31141, @graesslin wrote: > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1672#31140, @bdhruve wrote: > > > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1672#31046, @graesslin wrote: > > > > > I'm wondering: should we ensure that the ids are correct. E.g. a touchUp for id 1 doesn't make sense if we never got a touchDown for id 1. This would require tracking the used ids in FakeInputInterface. But it must be done somewhere - either in the library or by the user of the library. > > > > > > Martin, do you prefer this change to be done in this review only or in separate review. > > > I think it would be better to directly integrate it here. Hello, I've understood the problem and how to fix it in theory, but i am not sure on implementation details? For instance, I am not sure on where to track ids? On server side FakeInputInterface, FakeInputDevice or client side in FakeInput? So, can you please help me on this? REPOSITORY rKWAYLAND KWayland REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D1672 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: bdhruve, bshah, Plasma, graesslin Cc: bshah, graesslin, plasma-devel, sebas
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
