subdiff added a comment.

  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5928#112368, @cfeck wrote:
  
  > First, the difference between "color management" and "color correction" is 
that color correction is only one step in the color management workflow. KWin 
would need (again) be able to apply color correction to take part in the color 
management workflow. As such, the terms color correction and color management 
can be used interchangeably in the context of KWin discussion.
  >
  > Gamma correction (as implemented by the hardware LUTs) cannot be used for 
color correction, because it lacks the cross-component modifications computed 
by the 3x3 matrix or the 3D LUT.
  >
  > The term "gamma correction" has been used since decades in the context of 
video cards, even if they are not only used to apply gamma correction, but also 
brigthness/contrast adjustments, color inversion effects, and temperature 
adjustments.
  
  
  Thanks for the explanation in your own words, but there has to be some 
misunderstanding. I wanted to see a quote from a second source besides you 
where it says:
  
  "We define Color Correction as..." or "Color Correction is..."
  and
  "We define Gamma Correction as..." or "Gamma Correction is..."
  
  Because currently to me it seems Wikipedia and you have different notions of 
what color correction is supposed to be (also other sources disagree: 
https://creativepro.com/color-management-not-color-correction/). But I'll leave 
this naming discussion for now aside, because it's not really important. I 
would still say color correction is the right term to call it, since in the end 
the perceived result is a change of color temperature or color balance and not 
one of the overall gamma in particular. Since the old stuff, which got called 
color correction back then, has been removed and and when I look at the code 
likely won't come back, I also don't see a problem with naming my stuff that 
way. The old stuff should've been called differently anyway according to the 
above link. But I'll leave the naming decision to Martin, if this is ok with 
him.

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D5928

To: subdiff, #kwin
Cc: cfeck, graesslin, davidedmundson, plasma-devel, kwin, ZrenBot, spstarr, 
progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, eliasp, 
sebas, apol, mart, hein, lukas

Reply via email to