romangg added a comment.

  In D16997#462264 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16997#462264>, @ngraham wrote:
  
  > In D16997#462197 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16997#462197>, @romangg 
wrote:
  >
  > > [...]
  > >  That's good wording. The only issue I see is that a display arrangement, 
which has the display saved in the past with the second option selected will 
keep this display's values even if later in a different display arrangement the 
display values get changed with the first option selected.
  >
  >
  > Hmm, that seems like buggy behavior then. Can we fix this? 
Global/per-display-arrangement configurations shouldn't stomp on each other 
under any circumstance.
  
  
  Not sure if I explained it correctly, but this way the global and 
per-display-arrangements will stay out of their way. Imagine you cycle between 
three different display arrangements `A1,A2,A3` with following screens:
  
    A1: S1
    A2: S1, S2
    A3: S1 (90°-rotated), S2, S3
  
  In the beginning `A1` is active, which sets the global value for `S1`. Then 
you change to `A3` and change the rotated value of `S1` to 90° as 
arrangement-unique on `A3`. Now switching to `A1` or `A2` will load the global 
0°-rotation value of `S1` previously defined on `A1` and not take the 
(arrangement-unique) value of `S1` on `A3`.

REPOSITORY
  R104 KScreen

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D16997

To: romangg, #plasma
Cc: ngraham, plasma-devel, jraleigh, GB_2, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, 
ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart

Reply via email to