Is it necessary to require levels of assurance in the Basic Policy 
requirements? I definitely think it's appropriate for Advanced Policies. But I 
wonder whether including levels of assurance in Basic Policies will impede 
adoption.

Also, the fact that there are multiple LOA frameworks out there makes it 
difficult to meet the requirement to NOT require a priori bilateral agreements 
between the sender and recipient for Basic Policies. If the sender and 
recipient use different LOA scales, then some type of prior agreement must be 
in place to map the two scales. I don't think plasma wants to get into the 
business of creating a standard LOA mapping for interoperability.

-Scott

_______________________________________________
plasma mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma

Reply via email to