In the earlier check we assumed that "obj" could be NULL. I looked at some of the other places that call evaluate_object() and they check for NULL as well.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> --- Can obj actually be NULL here? Perhaps a better fix would be to remove the first check. diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c index a038595..efc776c 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ static int show_call(struct seq_file *m, void *data) else seq_printf(m, "%#x(%#x, %#x) = t:%d\n", asus->debug.method_id, asus->debug.dev_id, asus->debug.ctrl_param, - obj->type); + obj ? obj->type : -1); kfree(obj); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
