Author: shadzik Date: Sun Feb 21 16:23:47 2010 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD ---- Log message: - is there a reason for downloading tar.xz instead of .tar.bz2? - if there was one, now there is a reason not to (th builders do not recognize .xz) - rel 2
---- Files affected: packages/autoconf: autoconf.spec (1.141 -> 1.142) ---- Diffs: ================================================================ Index: packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec diff -u packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec:1.141 packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec:1.142 --- packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec:1.141 Sun Feb 21 17:16:05 2010 +++ packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec Sun Feb 21 17:23:42 2010 @@ -21,12 +21,12 @@ Summary(uk.UTF-8): GNU autoconf - автоконфігуратор вихідних текстів Name: autoconf Version: 2.65 -Release: 1 +Release: 2 License: GPL v2+/v3+ Group: Development/Building # stable releases: -Source0: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz -# Source0-md5: dfb23a46ecb73a0abade39c053a6c5a1 +Source0: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +# Source0-md5: a6de1cc6434cd64038b0a0ae4e252b33 # devel releases: #Source0: http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 Patch0: %{name}-mawk.patch @@ -280,6 +280,11 @@ All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org $Log$ +Revision 1.142 2010/02/21 16:23:42 shadzik +- is there a reason for downloading tar.xz instead of .tar.bz2? +- if there was one, now there is a reason not to (th builders do not recognize .xz) +- rel 2 + Revision 1.141 2010/02/21 16:16:05 shadzik - up to 2.65 - patch5 commented out, seems to be already upstream ================================================================ ---- CVS-web: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec?r1=1.141&r2=1.142&f=u _______________________________________________ pld-cvs-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit
