Author: arekm                        Date: Fri Nov 18 09:23:41 2011 GMT
Module: packages                      Tag: LINUX_2_6_38
---- Log message:
- rel 7; another cgroup OOM fix

---- Files affected:
packages/kernel:
   kernel.spec (1.924.2.11 -> 1.924.2.12) , kernel-small_fixes.patch (1.25.2.8 
-> 1.25.2.9) 

---- Diffs:

================================================================
Index: packages/kernel/kernel.spec
diff -u packages/kernel/kernel.spec:1.924.2.11 
packages/kernel/kernel.spec:1.924.2.12
--- packages/kernel/kernel.spec:1.924.2.11      Thu Nov 10 06:57:40 2011
+++ packages/kernel/kernel.spec Fri Nov 18 10:23:27 2011
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
 
 %define                basever         2.6.38
 %define                postver         .8
-%define                rel             6
+%define                rel             7
 
 %define                _enable_debug_packages                  0
 
@@ -1577,6 +1577,9 @@
 All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
 
 $Log$
+Revision 1.924.2.12  2011/11/18 09:23:27  arekm
+- rel 7; another cgroup OOM fix
+
 Revision 1.924.2.11  2011/11/10 05:57:40  arekm
 - rel 6; cgroup memory limit fixes
 

================================================================
Index: packages/kernel/kernel-small_fixes.patch
diff -u packages/kernel/kernel-small_fixes.patch:1.25.2.8 
packages/kernel/kernel-small_fixes.patch:1.25.2.9
--- packages/kernel/kernel-small_fixes.patch:1.25.2.8   Thu Nov 10 06:57:40 2011
+++ packages/kernel/kernel-small_fixes.patch    Fri Nov 18 10:23:36 2011
@@ -909,3 +909,76 @@
  }
  
  static int do_linear_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+commit 23751be0094012eb6b4756fa80ca54b3eb83069f
+Author: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
+Date:   Thu Aug 25 15:59:16 2011 -0700
+
+    memcg: fix hierarchical oom locking
+    
+    Commit 79dfdaccd1d5 ("memcg: make oom_lock 0 and 1 based rather than
+    counter") tried to oom lock the hierarchy and roll back upon
+    encountering an already locked memcg.
+    
+    The code is confused when it comes to detecting a locked memcg, though,
+    so it would fail and rollback after locking one memcg and encountering
+    an unlocked second one.
+    
+    The result is that oom-locking hierarchies fails unconditionally and
+    that every oom killer invocation simply goes to sleep on the oom
+    waitqueue forever.  The tasks practically hang forever without anyone
+    intervening, possibly holding locks that trip up unrelated tasks, too.
+    
+    Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
+    Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
+    Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
+    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
+    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
+
+diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
+index 0e40f02..ebd1e86 100644
+--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
++++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
+@@ -1841,29 +1841,23 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct 
mem_cgroup *root_mem,
+  */
+ static bool mem_cgroup_oom_lock(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+ {
+-      int lock_count = -1;
+       struct mem_cgroup *iter, *failed = NULL;
+       bool cond = true;
+ 
+       for_each_mem_cgroup_tree_cond(iter, mem, cond) {
+-              bool locked = iter->oom_lock;
+-
+-              iter->oom_lock = true;
+-              if (lock_count == -1)
+-                      lock_count = iter->oom_lock;
+-              else if (lock_count != locked) {
++              if (iter->oom_lock) {
+                       /*
+                        * this subtree of our hierarchy is already locked
+                        * so we cannot give a lock.
+                        */
+-                      lock_count = 0;
+                       failed = iter;
+                       cond = false;
+-              }
++              } else
++                      iter->oom_lock = true;
+       }
+ 
+       if (!failed)
+-              goto done;
++              return true;
+ 
+       /*
+        * OK, we failed to lock the whole subtree so we have to clean up
+@@ -1877,8 +1871,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_oom_lock(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+               }
+               iter->oom_lock = false;
+       }
+-done:
+-      return lock_count;
++      return false;
+ }
+ 
+ /*
================================================================

---- CVS-web:
    
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/kernel/kernel.spec?r1=1.924.2.11&r2=1.924.2.12&f=u
    
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/kernel/kernel-small_fixes.patch?r1=1.25.2.8&r2=1.25.2.9&f=u

_______________________________________________
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

Reply via email to