Author: baggins Date: Wed May 2 18:18:22 2012 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
---- Log message:
- looks like gcc 4.7 "fix" breaks kernel builds on i686
---- Files affected:
packages/binutils:
binutils.spec (1.359 -> 1.360) , binutils-fix-i686-kernel.patch (NONE ->
1.1) (NEW)
---- Diffs:
================================================================
Index: packages/binutils/binutils.spec
diff -u packages/binutils/binutils.spec:1.359
packages/binutils/binutils.spec:1.360
--- packages/binutils/binutils.spec:1.359 Thu Apr 26 21:34:32 2012
+++ packages/binutils/binutils.spec Wed May 2 20:18:17 2012
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
Patch7: %{name}-libtool-m.patch
Patch8: %{name}-build-id.patch
Patch9: %{name}-tooldir.patch
+Patch10: %{name}-fix-i686-kernel.patch
URL: http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/
BuildRequires: autoconf >= 2.64
BuildRequires: automake >= 1:1.11
@@ -160,6 +161,7 @@
%patch7 -p1
%patch8 -p0
%patch9 -p1
+%patch10 -p1
# file contains hacks for ac 2.59 only
%{__rm} config/override.m4
@@ -360,6 +362,9 @@
All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
$Log$
+Revision 1.360 2012/05/02 18:18:17 baggins
+- looks like gcc 4.7 "fix" breaks kernel builds on i686
+
Revision 1.359 2012/04/26 19:34:32 qboosh
- tests require statis -lstdc++ now
================================================================
Index: packages/binutils/binutils-fix-i686-kernel.patch
diff -u /dev/null packages/binutils/binutils-fix-i686-kernel.patch:1.1
--- /dev/null Wed May 2 20:18:22 2012
+++ packages/binutils/binutils-fix-i686-kernel.patch Wed May 2 20:18:17 2012
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+It seems that this:
+http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
+breaks i686 3.3.x kernel build
+
+--- binutils-2.22.52.0.2/bfd/linker.c~ 2012-04-25 19:42:51.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils-2.22.52.0.2/bfd/linker.c 2012-05-02 18:37:51.247665432 +0200
+@@ -3198,10 +3198,12 @@
+ best = prev;
+ }
+
+- /* Refuse to choose a section for which we are out of bounds. */
+- /* ??? This may make most of the above moot. */
+- if (addr < best->vma || addr > best->vma + best->size)
+- best = bfd_abs_section_ptr;
++// This code causes kernel issues in i686
++//
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-pl/2012-April/155404.html
++// /* Refuse to choose a section for which we are out of bounds. */
++// /* ??? This may make most of the above moot. */
++// if (addr < best->vma || addr > best->vma + best->size)
++// best = bfd_abs_section_ptr;
+
+ return best;
+ }
+--- binutils-2.22.52.0.2/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/warn2.d~ 2012-04-25
19:42:51.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils-2.22.52.0.2/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/warn2.d 2012-05-02
19:43:00.852579191 +0200
+@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@
+ # construct and that the symbol still appears as expected.
+
+ #...
+- +[0-9]+: +[0-9a-f]+ +20 +OBJECT +GLOBAL +DEFAULT +ABS Foo
++ +[0-9]+: +[0-9a-f]+ +20 +OBJECT +GLOBAL +DEFAULT +[1-9] Foo
+ #pass
================================================================
---- CVS-web:
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/packages/binutils/binutils.spec?r1=1.359&r2=1.360
_______________________________________________
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit
