Author: qboosh Date: Thu Jun 14 14:29:28 2012 GMT
Module: cdg Tag: HEAD
---- Log message:
IMO generally such additional regulation is not required, voting would happen
already by means of "conflict situation" like:
- more than one RM candidate with different distribution line vision
- some CDG member opposing particular person being RM.
Eventually regulations could define per-person (not just binary) voting in
case of more candidates.
But on the other side, such voting could be good as a "vote of confidence"
for particular person being RM so that others speaking about
"inappropriateness", "incompetence" etc. would know they are majority or
minority. And this could be good point.
---- Files affected:
cdg/aktualne-glosowania:
20120613-1449-add_rm_vote (1.14 -> 1.15)
---- Diffs:
================================================================
Index: cdg/aktualne-glosowania/20120613-1449-add_rm_vote
diff -u cdg/aktualne-glosowania/20120613-1449-add_rm_vote:1.14
cdg/aktualne-glosowania/20120613-1449-add_rm_vote:1.15
--- cdg/aktualne-glosowania/20120613-1449-add_rm_vote:1.14 Thu Jun 14
10:31:49 2012
+++ cdg/aktualne-glosowania/20120613-1449-add_rm_vote Thu Jun 14 16:29:23 2012
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
wolf:tak/yes
havner:tak/yes
blues:tak/yes
+qboosh:yes
Głosy NIE/NO:
================================================================
---- CVS-web:
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cdg/aktualne-glosowania/20120613-1449-add_rm_vote?r1=1.14&r2=1.15
_______________________________________________
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
pld-cvs-commit@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit
