commit d02222cd44b006c6a643de03a2cc6d86cae95d87
Author: misi3k <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Mar 20 09:07:39 2003 +0000

    - Attacking RSA-based Sessions in SSL/TLS (CAN-2003-0131)
    
    Changed files:
        openssl-security2.patch -> 1.1

 openssl-security2.patch | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
---
diff --git a/openssl-security2.patch b/openssl-security2.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5277735
--- /dev/null
+++ b/openssl-security2.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+--- ssl/s3_srvr.c      29 Nov 2002 11:31:51 -0000      1.85.2.14
++++ ssl/s3_srvr.c      19 Mar 2003 18:00:00 -0000
+@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@
+               if (i != SSL_MAX_MASTER_KEY_LENGTH)
+                       {
+                       al=SSL_AD_DECODE_ERROR;
+-                      
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_GET_CLIENT_KEY_EXCHANGE,SSL_R_BAD_RSA_DECRYPT);
++                      /* 
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_GET_CLIENT_KEY_EXCHANGE,SSL_R_BAD_RSA_DECRYPT); */
+                       }
+ 
+               if ((al == -1) && !((p[0] == (s->client_version>>8)) && (p[1] 
== (s->client_version & 0xff))))
+@@ -1463,30 +1463,29 @@
+                               (p[0] == (s->version>>8)) && (p[1] == 
(s->version & 0xff))))
+                               {
+                               al=SSL_AD_DECODE_ERROR;
+-                              
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_GET_CLIENT_KEY_EXCHANGE,SSL_R_BAD_PROTOCOL_VERSION_NUMBER);
+-                              goto f_err;
++                              /* 
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_GET_CLIENT_KEY_EXCHANGE,SSL_R_BAD_PROTOCOL_VERSION_NUMBER); */
++
++                              /* The Klima-Pokorny-Rosa extension of 
Bleichenbacher's attack
++                               * (http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/052/) exploits 
the version
++                               * number check as a "bad version oracle" -- an 
alert would
++                               * reveal that the plaintext corresponding to 
some ciphertext
++                               * made up by the adversary is properly 
formatted except
++                               * that the version number is wrong.  To avoid 
such attacks,
++                               * we should treat this just like any other 
decryption error. */
++                              p[0] = (char)(int) "CAN-2003-0131 patch 
2003-03-19";
+                               }
+                       }
+ 
+               if (al != -1)
+                       {
+-#if 0
+-                      goto f_err;
+-#else
+                       /* Some decryption failure -- use random value instead 
as countermeasure
+                        * against Bleichenbacher's attack on PKCS #1 v1.5 RSA 
padding
+-                       * (see RFC 2246, section 7.4.7.1).
+-                       * But note that due to length and protocol version 
checking, the
+-                       * attack is impractical anyway (see section 5 in D. 
Bleichenbacher:
+-                       * "Chosen Ciphertext Attacks Against Protocols Based 
on the RSA
+-                       * Encryption Standard PKCS #1", CRYPTO '98, LNCS 1462, 
pp. 1-12).
+-                       */
++                       * (see RFC 2246, section 7.4.7.1). */
+                       ERR_clear_error();
+                       i = SSL_MAX_MASTER_KEY_LENGTH;
+                       p[0] = s->client_version >> 8;
+                       p[1] = s->client_version & 0xff;
+                       RAND_pseudo_bytes(p+2, i-2); /* should be RAND_bytes, 
but we cannot work around a failure */
+-#endif
+                       }
+       
+               s->session->master_key_length=
================================================================

---- gitweb:

http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi/packages/openssl102.git/commitdiff/9fc1b1b87b259e8a327c99835865e91a391efc9e

_______________________________________________
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

Reply via email to